Gina Marie Dittmann vs Eleejah Inisan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 04 Jul at 01:04 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Marie Dittmann vs E. Inisan

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Dittmann 1 - 0 Inisan
They have played 3 sets in total, with Gina Marie Dittmann winning 2 and Eleejah Inisan winning 1. The last match between Gina Marie Dittmann and Eleejah Inisan was at the W15 Getxo, 04-07-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Gina Marie Dittmann getting the victory 6-2 6-7(4) 6-2.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Dittmann | 1 |
Inisan | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) W15 Getxo(07-04-25)
G. M. Dittmann vs E. Inisan H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
55.12% (70-57) | Career Total W/L | 56.25% (45-35) |
1 | Clay | 0 |
0 | Titles | 1 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
G. M. Dittmann vs E. Inisan Match Preview:
- Dittmann has a slightly better recent second serve performance, winning 39.15% of points compared to Inisan's 38.52%.
- Who excels in return games? Inisan leads here with 51.59% of second serve return points won, outperforming Dittmann's 48.65%.
- When dealing with first serve returns, Inisan again has the edge, winning 37.66% compared to Dittmann's 31.94%.
- Inisan struggles under pressure, saving only 39.6% of breakpoints, while Dittmann impressively saves 53.09%.
- Comparing match win rates over the past year, Inisan shows a slightly higher success rate with 50% compared to Dittmann's 48.98%.
- Looking at surface preferences, Inisan performs best on Hard courts with a 58% win rate, whereas Dittmann thrives on I.hard courts with 67% wins.
- Have they played against tough opponents? Inisan faced opponents with an average ranking of 373.08, slightly lower than Dittmann's opponents, who averaged a ranking of 352.06.
- If this match extends to a deciding set, Inisan holds an advantage by winning 40% of such sets versus Dittmann's 20% success rate.
- In terms of break point conversion, Inisan converts 45.1% of opportunities, which is slightly better than Dittmann's 43.22% conversion rate.
Editorial Prediction (July 4, 2025, UTC):
In comparing the players' recent performances, it's evident that both Inisan and Dittmann have shown strengths in different areas of the game. Dittmann has a slight upper hand in second serve performance and saving breakpoints, which are crucial for maintaining service games under pressure.
Inisan, however, exhibits dominance in return games, being particularly effective at converting first serve returns into points, which could disrupt Dittmann's rhythm. This is complemented by Inisan's ability to convert more breakpoint opportunities, giving them an advantage in pivotal moments of the match.
While Dittmann's proficiency on I.hard surfaces could be beneficial, Inisan's overall match win rate and ability to clinch deciding sets suggest they have resilience in tight situations. Factoring in all statistics, especially Inisan's edge in return games and deciding sets, Inisan is likely to emerge as the winner in this upcoming match.
Gina Marie Dittmann vs Eleejah Inisan Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. M. Dittmann vs E. Inisan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
18 | Games Won | 11 |
4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
2:21:4 | Average Match Time | 2:21:4 |
59% (54/91) | 1st Serve % | 61% (62/101) |
63% (34/54) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (35/62) |
62% (23/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (17/39) |
58% (7/12) | Break Pts Won % | 38% (3/8) |
49% (49/101) | Return Points Win % | 37% (34/91) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
G. M. Dittmann Recent Matches Played
E. Inisan Recent Matches Played

G. M. Dittmann vs E. Inisan Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
55.12% (70/57) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.25% (45/35) |
56.01% (163/128) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.49% (101/81) |
52.80% (1396/1248) | Games Win/Loss | 53.02% (878/778) |
58.00% (29/21) | Hard Win/Loss | 70.00% (14/6) |
50.00% (30/30) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.45% (31/27) |
64.71% (11/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
130 | Aces Total | 30 |
0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
337 | Total Double Faults | 221 |
1:23:27 | Average Match Time | 1:20:28 |
426.35 | Average Opponent Rank | 378.5 |
65% (4526/7016) | 1st Serve % | 67% (2718/4063) |
60% (2699/4526) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (1543/2718) |
45% (1127/2490) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (564/1345) |
50% (455/908) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (281/539) |
48% (3310/6924) | Return Points Win % | 49% (1939/3958) |
0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
54.93% (39/32) | Challenger W/L | 37.93% (11/18) |
55.36% (31/25) | Futures W/L | 68.00% (34/16) |
55% (70/127) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (45/80) |
60% (15/25) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (7/14) |
38% (14/37) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (11/22) |
87% (71/62) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (42/37) |
13% (71/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (42/5) |
14% (56/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (38/8) |